Meet Jamie Kelso, webidiot at the White Suprmemcist website stormfront.org. Here's his two cents on Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul:
Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Paul Craig Roberts and all the other MILLIONS of Liberty Patriots have their own range of reasons for wanting to defeat what they call The New World Order run by people with names like Kissinger, Netanyahu, and Rockefeller.
You, I, and the THOUSANDS of Racial Preservation Patriots have our own range of reasons for wanting to defeat what we call The Zionist Occupation Government run by people with names like Kissinger, Netanyahu, and Rockefeller.
Together we can win. Split apart...we lose.
Charming friends you got there, Rand... Share on Facebook
Posts
26 Comments:
Were y'all fans of the "friends of Barack" line of argument?
Yeah, seriously. How many unsavory characters did Barack Obama has actual associations with? Wright, Ayers, Rezko off the top of my head. These weren't just random goofballs on the internet either.
This guilt-by-association stuff is weak.
Now Obama is appointing some of these people to be his czars. His Green Jobs Czar and his Diversity Czar are both Fascist/Socialists. I don't know about his Pay Czar.
First of all, anyone who does ad hominem using Anonymous doesn't merit the pixels used to display their comment. If you're man enough to CALL names, you'reman enough (or woman enough) to USE your name.
Secondly - come on, Joe, there's no evidence Paul endorses these racists, is there? If there is, then print it. But having crazy people endorse him isn't Paul's fault.
Anon- do you even know what the words "fascist" and "socialist" mean? Even more, do you recognize that if you were to call someone who actually was either one of those things the other, they would probably hit you?
p.s.-I'm glad you've been getting your daily dose of Glenn Beck. it means they'll be committing you sooner rather than later.
taylor, are you disputing the claim that those czars are socialists or fascists? The fact that we even have "czars" disturbs me.
I like how your argument against anon basically boils down to threats of violence. Call somebody that and "they would probably hit you". And you listen to glenn Beck so you'll be "committed". Really? Is that all you have? People aren't allowed to have free political thought anymore without risk of being punched or committed? Your comment implies that such is your position.
specs- Glenn Beck calling someone a socialist is beside the point. I would venture a fairly educated guess that no member of the Obama administration is a fascist. Is Van Jones a socialist? Frankly, it doesn't matter. Is he going to ruin the country by being a socialist? Certainly not. Get your panties out of that bundle.
If having czars disturbs you so much, perhaps you should go back in time and get W and Karl Rove to reconsider some of their positions on executive power.
And violence?! I'm the most non-violent person you might ever meet (although I certainly wouldn't want to meet you)! My point being that if one can't understand that socialists and fascists are so diametrically opposed to one another so as to most likely react violently (or at the very least in a non-violent, but equally harsh manner), they deserve to be committed (for their own safety and everyone else's too). I'm not sure how being committed constitutes a threat of violence but I'd be happy to hear about it.
I'm all for free political discourse. I encourage it. But dumbasses who can't understand simple facts can stay at home and off the internet. That includes you, too.
Never hear Dr. Paul mentioning the new world order unless pressed by liberal bloggers.
taylor, don't play the Bush/Rove card on me. I did not support them or their ilk.
You don't think that restraining or imprisoning somebody against their will is an act of violence? Because that is pretty much what committing somebody is doing.
Why wouldn't you want to meet me? I've never threatened violence or advocated violent behavior. I even try to keep debate civil on a civil level. I don't usually resort to name-calling; as I consider it the sign of somebody that has lost the debate.
Fascism? Yes, our government has many elements of fascism. Many people would define fascism as when a government is in bed with corporations and in effect ruled by corporations. The only real common requirement we havent met to have a complete fascist goverment is having a dictator. The banker-bailout was a huge step forward for fascism, so was the auto-bailout and other big corporate bailouts.
So...were y'all fans of the "friends of Barack" line of argument?
specs- If you don't want that card played, then don't partake in the selective outrage. Forget that every US president since FDR has had 'czars'. Forget that many of the 'czars', both past and present, are actual senate-confirmed positions, which negates the point of their critique in the first place.
And by "many people", I'll take you to mean "people who adhere to overly simplistic and intentionally reductionist conceptualizations of political theory". The corporate takeover is more the evil stepchild of Keynesian intervention and Chicago school deregulation than it is fascism. But you can just pick and choose current events and figures and call them fascism if you wish. Perhaps a quick Wikipedia refresher might enlighten you to some of the intricacies of fascism, as well as socialism, liberalism, etc. Might do you some good.
Wow, What a Troll Post for a Blog.... Trying to get more hits on the ol' B&P, ...... Whoring out for the Hit counter are we?
This just in Obama hates white people because his preacher is crazy!
Pathetic. What next. Post a Nip slip of Elane Chao?
what people would traffic a blog with naked pictures of Elaine Chao???!!! Sounds like a recipe for least viewed blog ever, if you ask me!
How about the racist black panthers who tried to keep people from Voting in Philly? Maybe from that we can also infer something about how Obama feels about race? Would that be fair? Because thats exactly what you are doing here.
SO because someone supports Rand, rand must have the same beliefs as the person?
Absurd.
If thats the case, I know a racist that supports Trey Grayson.... means nothing
You have a totally wrong and embaressing understanding of the situation. Stormfront dot org has openly come out against Ron Paul & other liberty candidates months ago for being anti-racialism. Of course, typical Liberal blogs fail to report journalistically on the situation. Because one member of this website, which exceeds over 100,000 members, expresses these views, then that makes Rand Paul a racist? Help me understand the logic.
And Obama, associated with Black Nationalist Van Jones, gets swept under the rug. I see how it is...
--- Kentucky Voter.
It is pretty amazing, as half-Black/half-Hispanic Libertarian, that the Left would stoop this low. An obscure messageboard endorses Rand Paul and says hes a racialist? So this means everyone that supports Rand Paul is Ku Klux Klan-scum? Please, this has to be a joke. And I for one am not returning here. Nice way to win us over in Kentucky, insult our intelligence. That's a brilliant idea.
Obama, associated with people like Rev. Wright (for a decade), Van Jones (Communist & self-proclaimed black nationalist), etc... should by default make Barack Obama a racist by your logic. But noo, those people are actually personaly associated & friends with Obama. But I guess if an obscure racialist internet blogger came out in support of Obama, you would be judging Obama as a racist. Right? And as a half-black & Hispanic man.. I can tell you in my community I've heard racists of my color come out and back Obama. The difference is... I'm not immature enough to accuse Obama of racism over it.
And may I just say-- The Liberal blogs are acting us as bad as their MSNBC ideologues by using the word 'racist,' and 'neo-nazi' every second they can in order to scare voters off. I had one Union white Liberal try calling ME a self-hating black man at a local town hall rally. Absolutely disgusting. Well this will be my last post on this blog, I've always enjoyed the Liberal/Progressive perspective on things since the Bush admin. But now you lost one more fan. Bye.
Rand Paul attracts all kinds, I'll give him that much. Pothead atheists, religious fundamentalists, birthers, there's room for everyone in maverickdom!
As Dr. Paul says, "Freedom is popular!" The one thing uniting the diverse groups supporting Ron Paul is the desire to be left alone.
And by extension, his like-minded son, Rand Paul
Freedom is popular!" The one thing uniting the diverse groups supporting Ron Paul is the desire to be left alone
Freedom. Unless, of course, you're a woman...then all your uterus belong to Paul.
Actually Terri, You are incorrect. While Ron and Rand are Pro-Life. As supporters of the 10th amendment they respect the right for other states to kill babies if they so choose. Funny how the left only supports the 10 amendment when Gay Marriage is involved. I love all 10 of my Bill of Rights and I respect the right for California hippies to smoke pot if they want too. (Even if Obama does not, Hello Justice Department Free Charles Lynch)
The difference between all the "Baggers" and Johnny come latelys (that you love to hit on) and the Pauls is that they have been saying this stuff even when it was unpopular.
Rand Paul Y'all
Actually Terri, You are incorrect. While Ron and Rand are Pro-Life. As supporters of the 10th amendment they respect the right for other states to kill babies if they so choose. Funny how the left only supports the 10 amendment when Gay Marriage is involved. I love all 10 of my Bill of Rights and I respect the right for California hippies to smoke pot if they want too. (Even if Obama does not, Hello Justice Department Free Charles Lynch)
The difference between all the "Baggers" and Johnny come latelys (that you love to hit on) and the Pauls is that they have been saying this stuff even when it was unpopular.
Aww, hon, don't you worry your face. Always ahead the curve, I've hated Ron Paul *way* before he was popular.
I have no use for your states' rights canard regarding bodily autonomy either. Mostly because of that whole slavery and northern aggression thing.
Ahhh, Slavery...... The last bastion of those who hate States Rights. Slavery would have died without the war. Capitalism was already killing slavery throughout the Sugar Plantations. Cotton was next. Real slaves will never produce as much as a wage slave. Terri, you are a smart person. One day you will come over to our side. I for one LOVE the diversity that States rights creates. Iowa, Montana, California different strokes for different folks.
How is that War in Iraq working out for you? I voted for Ron Paul.
*I will apologize for that last statement if you voted for Kucinich. Plus you will get respect from this little anonymous coward.
Slavery would have died without the war. Capitalism was already killing slavery throughout the Sugar Plantations.
Easy for you to say, as a (presumably) white male whose human rights have *generally* always been protected in this country. (I presume, of course, b/c I've never personally met a Paulbot or Libertarian who was not a white male.)
Terri, Easy for history to say. I suggest you read the book, From columbus to Castro The history of the Caribbean by eric williams.
You have not met many paultards it looks like to me. The organizational meeting I attended last night was 50% female. 12 people is a small comparison but it goes to show I think you have not been looking hard enough. The group I associate with is lead statewide by a women and in my district by a women.
I consider myself a white male. However since SOME on the left think your background establishes some sort of street cred. I was Raised in a religious household. One of those pesky minority religions that are actually persecuted. I was not allowed to go to a christian school next door to my childhood home because my parents would not sign the pledge about the bible. They just wanted me to go to a good school. Thankfully I was allowed the diversity that comes from a public school. States Rights ALLOWS for Diversity to truly be practiced. What a wonderful world where Iowa can have gay marriage and Delaware can have sports betting. Maybe good ole Gatewood can give us back our industrial hemp.
P.S. My wife is a Libertarian..... I am just a Free Agent.
Oh how I hoped you would tell me you voted for Kucinich. I respect him even though we only occasionally agree. Obama and Bush are the same. They both want more power over our lives. Just different flavors of said power. It is sad that we fight over Bush and Obama. They are simply Jack Johnson and John Jackson in my mind.
Post a Comment